Linux kernel
============
There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.
In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.
Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.
Wengang Wang
authored
Though problem if found on a lower 4.1.12 kernel, I think upstream has same issue. In one node in the cluster, there is the following callback trace: # cat /proc/21473/stack __ocfs2_cluster_lock.isra.36+0x336/0x9e0 [ocfs2] ocfs2_inode_lock_full_nested+0x121/0x520 [ocfs2] ocfs2_evict_inode+0x152/0x820 [ocfs2] evict+0xae/0x1a0 iput+0x1c6/0x230 ocfs2_orphan_filldir+0x5d/0x100 [ocfs2] ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk+0x490/0x4f0 [ocfs2] ocfs2_dir_foreach+0x29/0x30 [ocfs2] ocfs2_recover_orphans+0x1b6/0x9a0 [ocfs2] ocfs2_complete_recovery+0x1de/0x5c0 [ocfs2] process_one_work+0x169/0x4a0 worker_thread+0x5b/0x560 kthread+0xcb/0xf0 ret_from_fork+0x61/0x90 The above stack is not reasonable, the final iput shouldn't happen in ocfs2_orphan_filldir() function. Looking at the code, 2067 /* Skip inodes which are already added to recover list, since dio may 2068 * happen concurrently with unlink/rename */ 2069 if (OCFS2...